MiniCAT: Effective Patient Radiation Dose

Unlike multi-purpose full-body CT scanners, MiniCAT™ has been specifically designed to scan the sinuses, skull base and temporal bones. Guided by the ALARA principle (As Low As Reasonably Achievable), MiniCAT™ has been optimized to provide high-quality images while minimizing the radiation dose to the patient.

 

MiniCAT™ Effective Dose*
Imaging Protocol
Effective Dose
Temporal Bone
0.14 mSv
Sinus 40 Second (Adult)
0.17 mSv
Sinus 20 Second (Child)
0.08 mSv
Sinus 10 Second (Follow-up)
0.04 mSv
Scout View
< .01 mSv

*An additional benefit of shorter scans is a reduced likelihood of patient motion artifacts.

             

 

Comparison to Other Modalities
Imaging Modality
Effective Dose
Conventional CT Sinus Scan 0.96 mSv
MiniCAT™ Sinus 40 Second 0.17 mSv
Skull X-Ray * 0.07 mSv
Chest X-Ray* 0.02 mSv
*Comparative figures taken from www.fda.gov/cdrh/ct/risks.html


MiniCAT™ Organ Dose
Organ
40 Second Sinus Scan

Temporal Bone

Thyroid
0.34 mGy
0.24 mGy
Salivary Gland
3.0 mGy
3.0 mGy
Bone Marrow
2.9 mGy

1.6 mGy

Skin
2.2 mGy
2.5 mGy
Brain
3.9 mGy
5.1 mGy
Total Effective Dose
0.17 mSv
0.14 mSv


Methods:
In calculating the effective dose, we closely followed the methodology suggested in ICRP 60 and Frederiksen et al. Twenty thermo-luminescent dosimeters (TLD) were placed in selected sites representing radio-sensitive tissues and organs in an anthropomorphic head phantom.2,3 The TLDs measured the absorbed dose to the thyroid, salivary gland, bone marrow, skin, and brain. The salivary gland was included in the effective dose calculations according to Frederiksen’s adaptation of the ICRP method3. The effective dose was calculated as the sum of the equivalent doses to each organ multiplied by that organ’s weighting factor.2,3 TLD measurements were not made for the 20 and 10 second scans. The values for these scans were approximated by linearly scaling the dose from the 40 second scan with the number of x-ray pulses used in each protocol.

  1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health. “What are the Radiation Risks from CT?” http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/ct/risks.html January 28,2008
  2. Publication 60 of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) “Radiation Protection. 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection,” Pergamon Press, Oxford 1990
  3. Frederiksen et al. (N.L. Frederiksen, B.W. Benson, and T.W. Sokolowski, “Effective dose and risk assessment from computed tomography of the maxillofacial complex,” Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, vol. 24, pp. 55-8, 1995)
  4. J. Alspaugh, E. Christodoulou, M. Goodsitt, J. Stayman, “Dose and Image Quality of Flat-Panel Detector Volume Computed Tomography for Sinus Imaging,” Medical Physics, vol. 34, pp. 26-34,2007

MiniCAT™ Dose Information: CTDI Values

To learn more about x-rays and the biological effects of x-rays, visit these sites:

The website of the American College of Radiology and Radiological Society of North America:
http://www.radiologyinfo.org/en/safety

U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Radiological Health:
http://www.pueblo.gsa.gov/cic_text/health/fullbody-ctscan/rqu.htm

Conference of Radiation Control Directors, Inc.:
http://www.crcpd.org